back to top



HOME     ABOUT US     RDC 5     LINKS    

 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
TRADE & INVESTMENT
AGRIBUSINESS
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
HOUSING
TOURISM
INFRASTRUCTURE
FISCAL STRENGTH
LABOR
POWER AND ENERGY
POWER SECTOR REFORM
BASIC NEED
PEACE AND ORDER
PEACE PROCESS
EDUCATION
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ANTI-CORRUPTION
GOOD GOVERNANCE

CHAPTER 10 POWER SECTOR REFORMS

   Activities conducted during the year that were geared towards power sector reforms include efforts to improve the viability and competitiveness of electric cooperatives (ECs) and the formulation of policies in consonance with the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) of 2001.

   Improving the Viability and Competitiveness of Electric Cooperatives

 

   Except for Ficelco, all the electric cooperatives in the region have systems loss levels above the 14 percent cap (Table 1). Moreover, except for Canoreco and Ticao, systems loss levels of the electric cooperatives increased in 2005 from their 2004 levels. Factors that affect this performance include: 1) non-compliance of ECs with systems loss segregation requirements; 2) increase in power pilferages due to high power rates; and 3) low supply voltage in some ECs.

 

Table 1 Systems Loss Level, by Electric Cooperative Bicol Region
2004 and 2005

EC

2004

Actual

2005

Actual
% Change
 Camarines Norte

15.92

15.47

(2.83)

 Camarines Sur I

18.64

20.87

11.96

 Camarines Sur II

18.82

19.18

1.91

 Camarines Sur III

21.35

24.68

15.60

 Camarines Sur IV

15.15

17.43

44.27

 Albay

21.10

21.26

0.76

 Sorsogon I

18.15

18.92

4.24

 Sorsogon II

18.98

19.22

1.26

 First Catanduanes

13.07

13.61

4.13

 Masbate

17.42

18.02

3.44

 Ticao

28.41

26.85

(5.49)

Total

18.82

19.65

4.41

   As part of its mandate to prepare ECs in operating and competing in the deregulated electric market, the National Electrification Administration (NEA) provided assistance in developing a system data for the segregation of systems loss as required by the Energy Regulatory Council (ERC). The preparation and issuance of Procurement Guidelines for ECs was also undertaken during the year, as part of the review and upgrading of regulatory policies with the objective of enhancing the ECs' viability.

 

Formulation of Policies

 

   Recognizing the need for ECs to become more competitive in the EPIRA environment, several institutional policies were passed by the NEA Board, to wit:

  1. New Criteria for Categorization. The new set of criteria was formulated to measure the ECs’ compliance to the rules and regulations by the players in the power industry. This set of criteria is reflective of the pursuit of the mandate of total electrification and capability to provide efficient and reliable supply of power to the member-consumers.

   Initial evaluation of the EC 2005 Categorization showed that only Ficelco earned an A rating, while Camarines Sur IV slid down to B rating. Two ECs obtained C and D ratings each, while 5 ECs were rated E.

  1. Adoption of the Model Organizational Structure for ECs. This provides for the creation of an Energy Trading Office and Energy Retail Service Department in preparation for the spot market and open access.

  2. Revised Policy on Selection, Hiring and Termination of Service/Suspension of General Managers (GMs) and Modified Qualification Standards for GMs. The policy details a more competitive process and criteria in appointing and/or terminating EC GMs.

  3. Human Resource Strengthening. The program was introduced to determine the types and levels of intervention needed to improve the EC managers’ core competencies.

   The issue of unpaid power arrearages of ALECO with the NPC amounting to Php 612.7 million, as well as its high systems loss rate of 21.26 percent remain unresolved. However, a rehabilitation plan is now being prepared with the Multi-Sectoral Council headed by Governor Fernando V. Gonzales. At present, two options are being considered to address these problems: a) the restructuring of the EC’s NPC account on achievable terms and b) the involvement of private initiative, such as the Investment Management Contract (IMC). One strong possibility though, is the assumption of management of ALECO by NPC, which is presently being seriously studied.

back to top