back to top



HOME     ABOUT US     RDC 5     LINKS    

 
FOREWORD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MACRO ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

PART I:  RESPONDING TO THE BASIC NEEDS

CHAPTER 1: HEALTH
CHAPTER 2:  NUTRITION
CHAPTER 3: FAMILY PLANNING
CHAPTER 4:  BASIC AND TERTIARY EDUCATION
CHAPTER 5: SKILLS DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 6: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 7:  SOCIAL WELFARE
CHAPTER 8:  LABOR WELFARE AND PROTECTION

PART II:  PROMOTING ECONOMIC GROWTH

CHAPTER 9:  AGRICULTURE
CHAPTER 10:  FISHERIES
CHAPTER 11:  FORESTRY
CHAPTER 12:  MINING AND QUARRYING
CHAPTER 13:  TRADE AND INDUSTRY
CHAPTER 14:  TOURISM

PART III: INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT FACILITIES

CHAPTER 15: LAND TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 16: WATER TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 17: AIR TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 18: COMMUNICATIONS
CHAPTER 19: IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL
CHAPTER 20: POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 21: INVESTMENT PROMOTION
CHAPTER 22:  PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT
CHAPTER 23:  SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CHAPTER 24:  GOOD GOVERNANCE
CHAPTER 25:  PEACE AND ORDER
CHAPTER 26:  DISASTER MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 27:  SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 28:  GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 29:  PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
CHAPTER 30:  FINANCING THE PLAN

ANNEX A: STATUS OF TOP TEN PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS OF BICOL REGION

   PART IV: DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

    

     Chapter 30. Financing the Plan

I. Summary

   The sources for financing the regional plan were the General Appropriations Act (GAA), Official Development Assistance (ODA), regular calamity funds, local government units and private sector.

 

   For CY 2008, PhP4.10 billion in capital outlay was appropriated for the implementation of priority programs and projects in the region (Table 30.1).  This was higher by PhP1.37 billion over the 2007 value of PhP2.73 billion.

Table 30.1 Capital Outlay of Government Entities, Bicol Region,

CY 2007 – 2008 (In Million Pesos)

Agency CY 2007 CY 2008 Inc./Dec
BFP            7.05              22.42          15.37
BIR            5.64              12.83            7.19
BJMP            3.59                5.19            1.60
BLGF            0.40                0.12           (0.28)
BU         158.01            170.16          12.15
Bureau of Customs               -                5.10            5.10
Bureau of Treasury             1.00                  -           (1.00)
CDA             0.44                1.00            0.56
CNSC             2.01                3.01            1.00
Cat SC             2.01              13.01          11.00
CSPC             2.01                3.01            1.00
CSSAC             2.01              38.01          36.00
DA               -              15.47          15.47
DBM               -                0.54            0.54
DEBESMSCAT             2.01                3.01            1.00
DENR           21.28            167.13        145.85
DILG             0.10                0.20            0.10
DOH           65.00              27.00         (38.00)
DOT           29.50                  -         (29.50)
DOTC         472.35               482.88          10.53
DPWH       1910.55          2983.00      1072.45
DSWD           17.00                  -         (17.00)
DTI             1.65                  -           (1.65)
EMB           10.00                1.00           (9.00)
FIDA               -                0.12            0.12
NCIP               -                      20.00          20.00
NHMFC               -                      62.50          62.50
NIA               -                      50.00          50.00
PSU             7.01              12.01            5.00
SSC             2.01                3.01            1.00
TESDA           10.30                6.10           (4.20)
TOTAL       2732.93          4107.83       1374.90

                        Sources: GAA 2007 and GAA 2008

   Seventy-three percent of the CY 2008 capital outlay went to the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). The Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) received PhP483 million. Among the state universities and colleges (SUCs), Bicol University (BU) had the highest capital outlay.  These amounts were either for the implementation of locally-funded projects or the local counterpart of foreign assisted projects.  

 

   Among the major projects implemented in the region with big funding support were the Bicol International Airport with PhP300 million released to the DOTC,  the Bicol River Basin and Watershed Management Project (BRBWMP) flood mitigation component with PhP200 million released to DPWH, and the BRBWMP watershed management component with PhP139 million released to the DENR.

 

   Local government units (provinces, cities and municipalities) spent PhP10.67 billion in 2008 for various services (Table 30.2).  Forty-one percent (PhP4.39 billion) of local government expenditures went to general public services.

Table 30.2 Local Government Expenditures, Bicol Region,

CY 2006 and 2008 (In Million Pesos)

Expenditure

CY 2006

CY 2008

Inc/Dec

General Public Services

3757.32

4388.14

631.82

Education, Culture, and Sports/Manpower Development

 208.24

226.38 18.14

Health, Nutrition, and Population Control

1045.09 1226.83     181.74

Labor and Employment

10.83

8.14

(2.69)

Housing and Community Development

53.83 47.21 (6.62)

Social Security/Social Services and Welfare

208.13 319.74 111.61

Economic Services

1508.33

1764.80

256.47

Debt Service

217.73

361.30

143.57

Other Purposes

2358.06

2323.86

(34.20)

TOTAL

9367.56

10666.40

1298.84

                       Source: BLGF 5

   Other purposes was allocated some PhP2.32 billion.  This was followed by economic services with PhP1.76 billion, and health, nutrition and population control with PhP1.23 billion.  Compared to 2006 expenditures, the 2008 expenses was PhP1.30 billion higher.  Most of the expense items increased except for labor and employment, housing and community development, and other purposes.

        

   On the strategy to tap other fund sources, several programs and projects were financed partly through foreign funds in the form of loans or entirely through grants.  Among the foreign assisted projects funded by loans were the Second Agrarian Reform Communities Development Project (ARCDP 2 –WB), the Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project (InFRES - ADB) and the Rural Road Network Development Project (RRNDP – JBICO).

 

   Grant assisted projects from the Spanish government through its international aid agency (AECID) were Poder y Prosperidad de la Comunidad (DSWD), Sustainable Management of Coastal Resources (SUMACORE - BFAR), Strengthening Agro-Industrial Sector for Bicol and Caraga (SAISBC - DA), Agriculture, Social Support and Environment Facility (ASSEF - NEDA), Improvement of the Quality of Education (IQPE - DepEd), and Strengthening Local Governments in the Philippines (SLGP - DILG). Another grant funded project was Restoring Food Security in Typhoon Affected Areas funded by FAO and implemented by DA.

 

   International NGOs operating in Bicol which provided a wide range of economic and social projects included Manos Unidos, Accion Contra el Hambre, Intervida, Fundacion CODESPA, IPADE, Cruz Roja Espanola, Humanismo y Democracia and Plan International. 

 

   Some local government units financed their projects through borrowings, bond flotation or through the build, operate and transfer (BOT) scheme.

 

   Other identified projects like large scale mining were financed through the private sector with capital infusion from foreign firms.

 

 Tax Collection

 

   Tax is the major source of government revenue that finances the implementation of programs and projects. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) handles tax collection in the country.

 

   Actual tax collection in CY 2008 increased by 1.64 percent (Table 30.3) compared in CY 2007. However, tax collection compared to the target was short by 13 percent.  Among the region’s revenue districts, only Virac met its target with the highest collection efficiency of 121 percent. All others were not able to meet their respective targets. Decrease in collection was felt in Iriga City, Legazpi City, Virac and Masbate City.  

 

   The identified factors that contributed to the decline in collection were the implementation of the exemption of minimum wage earners from taxation and the increase of personal and additional exemption under RA 9504, completion of the projects funded from calamity fund that reduced the collection of contractors’ taxes, very high goal allocation set for the region, change in the venue where tax remittance advice were paid and closure of some business establishments.

Table 30.3 Comparative Tax Collection by Revenue District,

Bicol Region, CY 2007 - 2008 (In Million Pesos)

 

Revenue District Office

 

Actual 2007

 

Target 2008

 

Actual 2008

2008 Collection Efficiency
 (in %)

(2008 vs. 2007) Percent Change

Daet

353.915

442.450

439.733

99.39

  24.25

Naga City

863.177

1124.764

926.212

82.35

    7.30

Iriga City

232.981

294.003

222.340

75.63

   (4.57)

Legazpi City

1548.482

1699.899

1507.810

88.70

   (2.63)

Sorsogon City

319.496

397.906

336.644

84.60

    5.37

Virac

234.423

176.915

213.870

120.89

   (8.77)

Masbate City

269.476

351.362

237.903

67.71

 (11.72)

Total

3821.951

4487.299

3884.512

86.57

    1.64

                        Source:  BIR District 10

   By tax type, income tax and value added tax accounted almost 90 percent of the total tax collection. In terms of collection efficiency, targets for   income, value added and percentage taxes were met.  Income tax collection for CY 2008 fell short by five percent. Value added tax collection was 18 percent lower than the target.  A comparison with the 2007 collections showed that income tax and value added tax fell by 0.88 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively (Table 30.4).

Table 30.4 Comparative Internal Revenue Tax Collection by Tax Type,

Bicol Region,  CY 2007 – 2008 (In Million Pesos)

 

Type of Tax

 

Actual 2007

 

Target 2008

 

Actual 2008

2008 Collection Efficiency (in %) (2008 vs. 2007) percent Change

Income

2224.750

2327.645

2205.213

   94.74

  (0.88)

Value Added

1273.119

1751.009

1253.521

   71.59

  (1.54)

Percentage

  154.514

  178.823

  175.176

   97.96

  13.75

Others

  143.804

  223.414

  243.311

 108.91

  69.20

Excise

    25.764

     6.408

     7.290

 113.76

 (71.70)

Total

3821.951

4487.299

3884.512

   86.57

    1.64

                       Source:  BIR District 10

   Cash collection of the Bureau of Customs (BOC) in 2008 increased by 58.14 percent compared in 2007. This was also higher by 45.78 percent than the target for the year.  For the non-cash income, the amount increased by 167.78 percent over the 2007 figure (Table 30.5).  

Table 30.5 Comparative Customs Revenue Collection, Bicol Region,

CY 2007 – 2008 (In Million Pesos)

 
Type of Collection


Actual 2007


Target 2008


Actual 2008

2008 Collection Efficiency
(in %)

(2008 vs. 2007) Percent Increase

Cash

36.873

40.000

58.311

145.78

58.14

Non-Cash

1018.925

-

2768.943

-

171.75

Total

1055.798

-

2827.254

-

167.78

                        Source: BOC 5

   The non-cash income of the Bureau of Customs was obtained from the National Food Authority (NFA) rice importation under the deferred payment scheme. The duties for the rice importation were paid in the ensuing year from their appropriations.

 

 Local Government Income

 

   Local government units (LGUs) had a total income of PhP12.24 billion in CY 2008 (Table 30.6). Of this amount, 81.5 percent came from internal revenue allotment (IRA). Local tax sources amounted to PhP1.634 billion while loans and borrowings amounted to PhP450 million.  Compared to the CY 2006 LGU income, the CY 2008 was higher by PhP1.84 billion. The data showed that LGUs still rely on the national government for their operations.  Local tax generation increased as a result of improved collection system, tax mapping activities and intensive tax information, and collection drives.    

Table 30.6 Income of Local Government Units, Bicol Region,

CY2006 and CY2008 (In Million Pesos)

Particulars

CY 2006

CY2008

Inc/Dec

Local

     

  Tax

675.03

825.47

150.44

  Non-Tax

603.25

808.77

205.52

Share from National Taxes

     

  IRA

8608.01

9979.28

1371.27

  Others

58.54

117.18

58.64

Extraordinary Receipts

174.17

62.52

(111.65)

Loans and Borrowings

277.11

449.89

172.78

Inter-Local Transfers

5.20

0.34

(4.86)

TOTAL

10401.31

12243.45

1842.14

                       Source: BLGF 5

 back to top